Legal Research Engine · v2.4.1
SYSTEM ONLINE

The machinereads faster.You argue better.

47M+Cases Indexed
9Federal Circuits
<2sQuery Response
99.1%Citation Accuracy
The Problem
0
new case filings
published TODAY
LIVE
847hrs
average attorney hours billed to legal research annually
23.4hrs
spent per motion on precedent research alone
$892
average hourly rate — spent searching, not arguing
67%
of associates report missing relevant cases under deadline
"It's 2:14 a.m. I've been on Westlaw for four hours. I've found twelve cases, cross-referenced three circuits, and I still don't know if I have the controlling precedent. The brief is due at 9."
Margaret Chen
Litigation Partner · 18 years practice · Chicago
The SolutionCounsel · Machine-speed research
Module 01 — Precedent Ranking

Jurisdictional weight,
ranked to the decimal.

Case NameJurisdictionYearCitedCircuitsTreatmentWeight
Winter v. NRDC
574 U.S. 528
Federal
2008
4,821
9
Positive
99
Waymo v. Uber Technologies
976 F.3d 1059
9th Circuit
2020
892
3
Positive
94
Stuhlbarg v. John D. Brush
879 F.2d 1572
9th Circuit
2001
1,203
5
Positive
89
Alliance for the Wild Rockies
519 F.3d 978
9th Circuit
2010
445
2
Neutral
85
Turret Labs v. CargoSprint
2021 WL 4816598
N.D. Cal.
2021
67
0
Positive
71
OOO Brunswick Rail
982 F.3d 1177
9th Circuit
2020
134
1
Distinguished
68
Module 02 — Citation Network

Every case.
Every connection.

SCOTUS / Apex
Circuit Court
District Court
Your Brief
WintereBayWaymoStuhlbargAllianceGarciaAbendTurretBrunswickYour Brief
Find the argument no one else found

Your query. Live results.
No signup wall.

Run Your First Query →
Module 03 — Motion Templates

The brief, pre-loaded.
You argue. We structure.

Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Four-factor Winter test with jurisdictional precedent mapping
High
Motion to Dismiss (12(b)(6))
Twombly/Iqbal plausibility standard with circuit-specific application
Medium
Motion for Summary Judgment
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby standard, no genuine dispute analysis
High
Emergency TRO Application
Ex parte procedures with notice requirements and bond analysis
High
Structure Preview
4.2 hrs → 18 min
01Likelihood of Success
02Irreparable Harm
03Balance of Equities
04Public Interest
05Supporting Declaration
06Proposed Order
Time Savings Analysis
Traditional research4.2 hrs
With Counsel18 min
The argument no one else found is already in the database

Stop searching.Start arguing.

One query. Every relevant statute, case, and motion argument — ranked, weighted, and ready. No form. No onboarding. Just the work.

Run Your First Query →
Pre-loaded with a live trade secret query · No account required
340+ firms
Used by litigators at
1.8 seconds
Average time to first result
12–40
Cases surfaced per query
Engine live
Run Your First Query →